+0
Karma
| Class: | 0514 443 - Cognitive Psychology |
| Subject: | Psychology |
| University: | Rochester Institute of Technology |
| Term: | Spring 2010 |
INCORRECT
CORRECT

|
memory code
|
representation used to store an item into memory physical: visual phonemic: auditory semantic: meaning based |
|
orienting task( judgment task)
|
instructions to focus on a particular aspect of a stimulus 9 physical, phonemic, semantic) |
|
Information Processing Model
|
a theory that states deeper semantic levels of processing enhances memory the more processing, the better the memory |
|
STM
|
limited amount of info 7 +/- 2; 20 sec |
Koofers.com
|
LTM
|
long term memory limitless rehersal of short term memory puts things in long term memory forgetting rate is slow |
|
Stages of Verbal Memory
|
STM LTM 1. format info phonemic, visual? largely semantic 2. capacity small limitless 3. info loss interference/decay loss of retrival |
|
Level of Processing theory
|
the greater the semantic analysis, the greather the depth of the processing and more durable the memory |
|
elaboration
|
storing associations to help recall target item ex. vase : broke aunt's vase semantic elaboration helps reconstruct elaboration makes memory easier to retrieve |
Koofers.com
|
Distinctiveness
|
item that is different in appearence or meaning from other objects |
|
primary distinctiveness
|
item distinct from other in immediate context |
|
Secondary Distinctiveness
|
an item is distinct from one in LTM as oppose to the items in immediate context-- as oppose to whats in front of your face |
|
orthographic distinctiveness
|
lowercase words with distinct shape ex. kakhi : distinct ex. kennel: not distinct |
Koofers.com
|
emotional distinctivness
|
items that produce emotional reponse |
|
flashbulb memory
|
memory of an important event that caused emotional reaction. - based on confidence not consisteny - gets inaccurate over time |
|
Encoding Specificity Principle
|
The encoding specificity principle is a theory about human memory in cognitive psychology. specific encoding operations performed in which - the percieved determines what is stored - what is stored determines the retrival cues memory code should math retrival cue encoding match retrival cue |
|
concrete object
|
easy to form image ex. flower, dress |
Koofers.com
|
abstract concept
|
difficult to form an image " low imagry" |
|
propositional theory
|
images are not unintrepreted pictures int he head image= description of a scene spatical knowledge can be expressed in semantic based propositions |
|
theory of visual images
|
process images same as processing perceptual information image= spatial representation analougus to the experiencde of seeing the object during the visual |
|
category
|
consist of objects/ events we group together because we feel they are related |
Koofers.com
|
artificial categories
|
category that can be distingushed on a basis of a simple rule |
|
Real Life/ Natural Categories
|
cannot be distingushed on basis of single rule : novel patterns properties: 1. don't share identical attributescategory members may share some attributers 2. not all good 3. hierarchial organized 4. categorized by how we use them, not abstract rules 5. fuzzy borders 6. no features must be present nor are any specfic featrues sufficient |
|
typicality
|
how well members of a category represent that category |
|
exempler model
|
people remember examples from the category to compare the novel patterns to the example |
Koofers.com
|
features models
|
classify novel patterns by determining how many features match category features |
|
prototype model
|
people create a pattern that they feel is a good represenative of the category |
|
theory- based model
|
base cattergories on what our knowledge and prior experience tell us about the object |
|
nearest neighbor rule
|
person compares the novel pattern to all patterns to find the one most similar |
Koofers.com
|
prototype rule
|
mainly average of all patterns in that category |
|
feature frequeny
|
look at features of a novel patrern and compare how many times they exactly match features of category patters |
Koofers.com
Front |
Back |
|
|---|---|---|
| memory code | representation used to store an item into memory physical: visual phonemic: auditory semantic: meaning based | |
| orienting task( judgment task) | instructions to focus on a particular aspect of a stimulus 9 physical, phonemic, semantic) | |
| Information Processing Model | a theory that states deeper semantic levels of processing enhances memory the more processing, the better the memory | |
| STM | limited amount of info 7 +/- 2; 20 sec | |
| LTM | long term memory limitless rehersal of short term memory puts things in long term memory forgetting rate is slow | |
| Stages of Verbal Memory | STM LTM 1. format info phonemic, visual? largely semantic 2. capacity small limitless 3. info loss interference/decay loss of retrival | |
| Level of Processing theory | the greater the semantic analysis, the greather the depth of the processing and more durable the memory | |
| elaboration | storing associations to help recall target item ex. vase : broke aunt's vase semantic elaboration helps reconstruct elaboration makes memory easier to retrieve | |
| Distinctiveness | item that is different in appearence or meaning from other objects | |
| primary distinctiveness | item distinct from other in immediate context | |
| Secondary Distinctiveness | an item is distinct from one in LTM as oppose to the items in immediate context-- as oppose to whats in front of your face | |
| orthographic distinctiveness | lowercase words with distinct shape ex. kakhi : distinct ex. kennel: not distinct | |
| emotional distinctivness | items that produce emotional reponse | |
| flashbulb memory | memory of an important event that caused emotional reaction. - based on confidence not consisteny - gets inaccurate over time | |
| Encoding Specificity Principle | The encoding specificity principle is a theory about human memory in cognitive psychology. specific encoding operations performed in which - the percieved determines what is stored - what is stored determines the retrival cues memory code should math retrival cue encoding match retrival cue | |
| concrete object | easy to form image ex. flower, dress | |
| abstract concept | difficult to form an image " low imagry" | |
| propositional theory | images are not unintrepreted pictures int he head image= description of a scene spatical knowledge can be expressed in semantic based propositions | |
| theory of visual images | process images same as processing perceptual information image= spatial representation analougus to the experiencde of seeing the object during the visual | |
| category | consist of objects/ events we group together because we feel they are related | |
| artificial categories | category that can be distingushed on a basis of a simple rule | |
| Real Life/ Natural Categories | cannot be distingushed on basis of single rule : novel patterns properties: 1. don't share identical attributescategory members may share some attributers 2. not all good 3. hierarchial organized 4. categorized by how we use them, not abstract rules 5. fuzzy borders 6. no features must be present nor are any specfic featrues sufficient | |
| typicality | how well members of a category represent that category | |
| exempler model | people remember examples from the category to compare the novel patterns to the example | |
| features models | classify novel patterns by determining how many features match category features | |
| prototype model | people create a pattern that they feel is a good represenative of the category | |
| theory- based model | base cattergories on what our knowledge and prior experience tell us about the object | |
| nearest neighbor rule | person compares the novel pattern to all patterns to find the one most similar | |
| prototype rule | mainly average of all patterns in that category | |
| feature frequeny | look at features of a novel patrern and compare how many times they exactly match features of category patters |
© Copyright 2012 , Koofers, Inc. All rights reserved.
The information provided on this site is protected by U.S. and International copyright law, and other applicable intellectual property laws, including laws covering data access and data compilations. This information is provided exclusively for the personal and academic use of students, instructors and other university personnel. Use of this information for any commercial purpose, or by any commercial entity, is expressly prohibited. This information may not, under any circumstances, be copied, modified, reused, or incorporated into any derivative works or compilations, without the prior written approval of Koofers, Inc.