+0
Karma
| Class: | COM 1101 - Introduction to Interpersonal Communication |
| Subject: | Communication |
| University: | Seattle Pacific University |
| Term: | Spring 2011 |
INCORRECT
CORRECT

|
Aggressiveness
|
Verbal attacks that demean others' self-concepts and inflict psychological pain |
|
Ambiguous Response
|
A response with more than one meaning, leaving the other person unsure of the responder's position. |
|
argumentativeness
|
Presenting and defending positions on issues while attacking positions taken by others, |
|
certainty
|
Dogmatically stating or implying that one's position is correct and others' ideas are not worth considering. Likely to arouse defensiveness, according to Gibb. |
Koofers.com
|
communication climate
|
The emotional tone of a relationship between two or more individuals. |
|
complaining
|
A disagreeing message that directly or indirectly communicates dissatisfaction with another person. |
|
confirming communication
|
A message that expresses caring or respect for another person; the person is valued by the speaker. |
|
controlling communication
|
According to Gibb, messages that attempt to impose some sort of outcome on another person, resulting in a defensive response. |
Koofers.com
|
defensiveness
|
The attempt to protect a presenting image a person believes is being attacked. |
|
description
|
Messages that describe a speaker's position without evaluating others. |
|
disagreeing messages
|
A message that essentially communicates to another person, 'You are wrong,' and includes argumentativeness, complaining, and aggressiveness. |
|
disconfirming communication
|
A message that expresses a lack of caring or respect for another person; the person is not valued by the speaker. |
Koofers.com
|
empathy
|
The ability to project oneself into another person's point of view in an attempt to experience the other's thoughts and feelings. |
|
equality
|
A type of supportive communication described by Gibb, which suggests that the sender regards the receiver with respect |
|
evaluation
|
A message in which a sender judges a receiver in some way, usually resulting in a defensive response. |
|
face
|
The image an individual wants to project to the world. See presenting self. |
Koofers.com
|
face-threatening acts
|
Behavior by another that is perceived as attacking an individual's presenting image, or face. |
|
impersonal response
|
A disconfirming response that is superficial or trite. |
|
impervious response
|
A disconfirming response that ignores another person's attempt to communicate. |
|
incongruous response
|
A disconfirming response in which two messages, one of which is usually nonverbal, contradict one another. |
Koofers.com
|
interrupting response
|
A disconfirming response in which one communicator interrupts another. |
|
irrelevant response
|
A disconfirming response in which one communicator's comments bear no relationship to the previous speaker's ideas. |
|
neutrality
|
A defense-arousing behavior described by Gibb in which the sender expresses indifference toward a receiver. |
|
presenting self
|
The image a person presents to others. It may be identical with or different from the perceived and desired selves. |
Koofers.com
|
problem orientation
|
A supportive style of communication described by Gibb in which the communicators focus on working together to solve their problems instead of trying to impose their own solutions on one another. |
|
provisionalism
|
A supportive style of communication described by Gibb in which a sender expresses open-mindedness to others' ideas and opinions. |
|
sandwich method
|
Embedding an expression of concern between two positive comments. |
|
spiral
|
A reciprocal communication pattern in which messages reinforce one another. See escalatory spiral; de-escalatory spiral. |
Koofers.com
|
spontaneity
|
A supportive communication behavior described by Gibb in which the sender expresses a message without any attempt to manipulate the receiver. |
|
strategy
|
A defense-arousing style of communication described by Gibb in which a sender tries to manipulate or deceive a receiver. |
|
superiority
|
A defense-arousing style of communication described by Gibb in which the sender states or implies that the receiver is not worthy of respect. |
|
tangential response
|
A disconfirming response that uses the speaker's remark as a starting point for a shift to a new topic. |
Koofers.com
Front |
Back |
|
|---|---|---|
| Aggressiveness | Verbal attacks that demean others' self-concepts and inflict psychological pain | |
| Ambiguous Response | A response with more than one meaning, leaving the other person unsure of the responder's position. | |
| argumentativeness | Presenting and defending positions on issues while attacking positions taken by others, | |
| certainty | Dogmatically stating or implying that one's position is correct and others' ideas are not worth considering. Likely to arouse defensiveness, according to Gibb. | |
| communication climate | The emotional tone of a relationship between two or more individuals. | |
| complaining | A disagreeing message that directly or indirectly communicates dissatisfaction with another person. | |
| confirming communication | A message that expresses caring or respect for another person; the person is valued by the speaker. | |
| controlling communication | According to Gibb, messages that attempt to impose some sort of outcome on another person, resulting in a defensive response. | |
| defensiveness | The attempt to protect a presenting image a person believes is being attacked. | |
| description | Messages that describe a speaker's position without evaluating others. | |
| disagreeing messages | A message that essentially communicates to another person, 'You are wrong,' and includes argumentativeness, complaining, and aggressiveness. | |
| disconfirming communication | A message that expresses a lack of caring or respect for another person; the person is not valued by the speaker. | |
| empathy | The ability to project oneself into another person's point of view in an attempt to experience the other's thoughts and feelings. | |
| equality | A type of supportive communication described by Gibb, which suggests that the sender regards the receiver with respect | |
| evaluation | A message in which a sender judges a receiver in some way, usually resulting in a defensive response. | |
| face | The image an individual wants to project to the world. See presenting self. | |
| face-threatening acts | Behavior by another that is perceived as attacking an individual's presenting image, or face. | |
| impersonal response | A disconfirming response that is superficial or trite. | |
| impervious response | A disconfirming response that ignores another person's attempt to communicate. | |
| incongruous response | A disconfirming response in which two messages, one of which is usually nonverbal, contradict one another. | |
| interrupting response | A disconfirming response in which one communicator interrupts another. | |
| irrelevant response | A disconfirming response in which one communicator's comments bear no relationship to the previous speaker's ideas. | |
| neutrality | A defense-arousing behavior described by Gibb in which the sender expresses indifference toward a receiver. | |
| presenting self | The image a person presents to others. It may be identical with or different from the perceived and desired selves. | |
| problem orientation | A supportive style of communication described by Gibb in which the communicators focus on working together to solve their problems instead of trying to impose their own solutions on one another. | |
| provisionalism | A supportive style of communication described by Gibb in which a sender expresses open-mindedness to others' ideas and opinions. | |
| sandwich method | Embedding an expression of concern between two positive comments. | |
| spiral | A reciprocal communication pattern in which messages reinforce one another. See escalatory spiral; de-escalatory spiral. | |
| spontaneity | A supportive communication behavior described by Gibb in which the sender expresses a message without any attempt to manipulate the receiver. | |
| strategy | A defense-arousing style of communication described by Gibb in which a sender tries to manipulate or deceive a receiver. | |
| superiority | A defense-arousing style of communication described by Gibb in which the sender states or implies that the receiver is not worthy of respect. | |
| tangential response | A disconfirming response that uses the speaker's remark as a starting point for a shift to a new topic. |
© Copyright 2012 , Koofers, Inc. All rights reserved.
The information provided on this site is protected by U.S. and International copyright law, and other applicable intellectual property laws, including laws covering data access and data compilations. This information is provided exclusively for the personal and academic use of students, instructors and other university personnel. Use of this information for any commercial purpose, or by any commercial entity, is expressly prohibited. This information may not, under any circumstances, be copied, modified, reused, or incorporated into any derivative works or compilations, without the prior written approval of Koofers, Inc.