She posts the PowerPoints, but during class she has to correct herself several times in order to teach a concept and doesn't thoroughly present the information. Her tests have problems similar to the ones in the notes and the homeworks, but the test questions are much harder. Her multiple choice test was the hardest test of the entire semester besides the very long final, and she doesn't curve either because they are multiple choice.
Professor rated by: BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE Student on February 18, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
2
She seems very monotone and puts people to sleep very fast. She wil also work problems on her own and forget to help the class with how to do the problem.
Professor rated by: PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Student on November 11, 2009
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
1
Very lazy teacher and horrible lecturer. Doesnt curve tests despite the fact that over half of the class failed. Office hours are sparce to begin with and she frequently cancels many of those for various reasons. You can get by the first two exams using knowlege from high school, but once you get to the third exam and the final, you are screwed, due to her inability to teach. Only advantage over other teachers is the homework is a joke. Try and switch out if at all possible
Professor rated by: ENGINEERING Student on December 12, 2009
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Pros: She was okay kinda nice (in class). She did experiments and sometimes it was interesting.
Cons: Her voice soothes me to sleep. She's not too nice when it comes to grades or asking her questions. She was decently easy though. The hardest part about her class is that there is much more conceptual questions and being chemistry those suck. If I could do it again I would go with Brown, he is a work out problem guy.
Professor rated by: PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Student on September 7, 2011
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
4
Pros: She, as well as her TA, are very knowledgable and are always avialable during offices hours. In addition, they never just give you the answer and allow students to teach students.
Cons: Prof. Goody can move fast at times and can give out difficult homework, but it's rare.
Professor rated by: ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY Student on November 14, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Pros: had notes online, good teaching style.
Cons: clickers to take attendance, give quizes in class.
she used to teach 101 so there is a little more theory than 107 should have but overall a good prof.
Professor rated by: GEOLOGY Student on February 20, 2011
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
1
She's SOOOOO boring. It's hard to pay attention. She makes you want to sleep, and the just not that great of a "teacher."
Professor rated by: OCEAN ENGINEERING Student on November 18, 2009
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
4
Pros: You learn a lot in class
Cons: Well her tests were based on someone else's, so what she taught in class wasnt precisely what was in the test
Professor rated by: ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Student on December 7, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Pros: seemed to want to help
Cons: i couldn't really learn the material from her
it's chemistry
Professor rated by: AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Student on December 10, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Pros: Taught off powerpoints
Cons: Sometimes didn't know the correct answer. clicker questions
Professor rated by: HORTICULTURE Student on December 6, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
2
Aloof teaching style. poor lesson plan, inadequate test preparation
Professor rated by: CIVIL ENGINEERING Student on November 23, 2009
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
4
Take good notes and do extra problems from the book.
Professor rated by: Computer Sci. & Engr. Student on December 8, 2009
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
2
Cons: Boring prof. Couldn't keep my attention, ever.
Professor rated by: AEROSPACE ENGINEERING Student on May 15, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
4
Pros: It is chemistry it is not going to be fun
Professor rated by: Undeclared Student on April 13, 2011
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
2
She's a pretty terrible lecturer.
Professor rated by: ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Student on November 23, 2009
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Pros: oh
Cons: tests
asdf
Professor rated by: PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Student on May 18, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Professor rated by: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING Student on January 16, 2012
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Professor rated by: ENGINEERING Student on December 11, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
2
Professor rated by: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Student on December 7, 2010
Helpful Rating?
YES
NO
CHEM 107
GEN CHEM FOR ENGINEERS
3
Professor rated by: COMPUTER SCIENCE Student on April 13, 2010
The information provided on this site is protected by U.S. and International copyright law, and other applicable intellectual property laws, including laws covering data access and data compilations. This information is provided exclusively for the personal and academic use of students, instructors and other university personnel. Use of this information for any commercial purpose, or by any commercial entity, is expressly prohibited. This information may not, under any circumstances, be copied, modified, reused, or incorporated into any derivative works or compilations, without the prior written approval of Koofers, Inc.