Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Lecture Notes on Exercise 36 - Calculus and Analytic Geometry I | MATH 109, Study notes of Analytical Geometry and Calculus

Material Type: Notes; Class: Calculus & Analytic Geom I; Subject: Mathematics; University: University of San Francisco (CA); Term: Spring 2006;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 07/30/2009

koofers-user-imb-1
koofers-user-imb-1 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Related documents


Partial preview of the text

Download Lecture Notes on Exercise 36 - Calculus and Analytic Geometry I | MATH 109 and more Study notes Analytical Geometry and Calculus in PDF only on Docsity! A note on exercise #36 in Section 2.4 of Stewart’s Calculus Use the ε,δ definition of limit (on page 115) to prove that: limit x→2 1/x = ½ . What we need to do here is to show how, for any given number ε > 0 we can select some corresponding number δ > 0 so that, if x is chosen to satisfy | x – 2 | < δ , then the function-value 1/x will satisfy | 1/x – 1/2 | < ε . After doing some scratch work, we have discovered how the choice for δ can be made, so we can now present our proof. Proof: Suppose ε > 0 has been selected. Let us then choose δ = minimum{ 1, 2ε }. This choice for δ will assure us that 0 < δ ≤ 1 and also that δ ≤ 2ε , two facts which we will need to use in the reasoning below. So let us now assume that x is any number which satisfies the inequality | x – 2 | < δ . We know we can multiply both sides of this inequality by any positive value and retain the direction of the inequality sign. In particular, we could multiply by 1/| 2x | if we knew that x was nonzero. But because of our prior assumption that | x – 2 | < δ and because we chose δ ≤ 1 , we can be sure that x lies in the interval 1 ≤ x ≤ 3 , and so x cannot be zero. Therefore by multiplication we can obtain the inequality: | x – 2 |/| 2x | < δ/| 2x | . Remembering (from high school algebra) that a quotient of absolute values equals the absolute value of the quotient, and remembering the rules for adding two fractions, we see that we can rewrite the left-hand term of this inequality: | x – 2 |/| 2x | = | (x - 2)/2x | = | 1/2 – 1/x | = | 1/x – 1/2 | Thus our inequality becomes: | 1/x – 1/2 | < δ/| 2x | , and, since x is larger than 1, we can drop the absolute-value sign on the right side: | 1/x – 1/2 | < δ/ 2x . But if x is larger than 1, then 1/2x will be smaller than ½ , so we get: | 1/x – 1/2 | < δ/ 2x < δ/ 2 . Remembering that we chose δ so that δ ≤ 2ε , we see that we can get: | 1/x – 1/2 | < δ/ 2 ≤ 2ε/2 = ε . As we explained at the outset, this was all that we needed to show! ■
Docsity logo



Copyright © 2024 Ladybird Srl - Via Leonardo da Vinci 16, 10126, Torino, Italy - VAT 10816460017 - All rights reserved